3 Classification of extreme value distributions
3.1 Auxiliary classification I
Suppose that
is differentiable and satisfies
and
for some \(\alpha \colon \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) and every \(s,h \in \mathbb {R}\). Then \(Q\) is twice continuously differentiable and satisfies
Note first that the equation implies (rearranging and dividing by \(h\)), for any \(s\) and \(h \ne 0\),
Taking the limit as \(h \to 0\) and using \(Q(0)=0\) yields \(Q'(s) = Q'(0) \, \alpha (s) = \alpha (s)\), where we also took into account \(Q'(0) = 1\). Therefore necessarily \(\alpha = Q'\), and the equation can be rewritten in the form
Rearranging the equation, we find
and interchanging the role of \(s\) and \(h\) also
Subtracting the last two equations yields
which by rearranging and dividing by \(h \ne 0\) yields
Taking the limit \(h \to 0\), recalling \(Q(0)=1\) and \(Q'(0)=1\), gives the existence of the second derivative \(Q''(0)\) and the equation
Solving \(Q'(s) = 1 + Q''(0) \, Q(s)\) and recalling that \(Q\) is differentiable shows that \(Q'\) is also differentiable, so \(Q\) is indeed twice differentiable. Differentiating, we get the asserted equation
Since \(Q'\) is differentiable and in particular continuous, this also shows that \(Q''\) is continuous, i.e., that \(Q\) is twice continuously differentiable.
Suppose that \(Q \colon \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) is twice continuously differentiable and \(Q'\) is positive and \(Q\) and satisfies \(Q(0)=0\), \(Q'(0) = 1\), and the equation concluded in Lemma 3.1 with \(\gamma = Q''(0)\), i.e.,
Then \(Q\) is given by
Since \(Q\) is differentiable and \(Q'(s){\gt}0\) for any \(s \in \mathbb {R}\), we can write 2 as
Integrating and noting \(\log Q'(0) = \log 1 = 0\), this yields \(\log Q'(s) = \gamma s\) for all \(s \in \mathbb {R}\), or equivalently \(Q'(s) = e^{\gamma s}\). Integrating a second time and noting \(Q(0) = 0\), this yields the desired formulas in the two cases \(\gamma \ne 0\) and \(\gamma = 0\), respectively, as follows.
If \(\gamma \ne 0\), then we get
If \(\gamma = 0\), then we get
If \(f : \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) is nondecreasing, then the derivative \(f'(x)\) exists at almost every \(x \in \mathbb {R}\). In particular there exists points \(x\) where \(f'(x)\) exists.
(The proof is already in Mathlib.)
Suppose that \(E \colon (0,\infty ) \to \mathbb {R}\) is nondecreasing and nonconstant function which satisfies \(E(1) = 0\) and
for some \(A \colon (0,\infty ) \to (0,\infty )\) and all \(\lambda , \sigma {\gt} 0\). Then, denoting \(c = E'(1)\) and \(\gamma = \frac{1}{E'(1)} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}{s}^2} E(e^s) \big|_{s=0}\), for all \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\) we have
Denote \(H(s) = E(e^s)\) for \(s \in \mathbb {R}\). Then \(H(0) = E(1) = 0\) and \(H\) is also nondecreasing and nonconstant. By Theorem 3.3, there exists some \(s_0 \in \mathbb {R}\) such that the derivative \(H'(s_0)\) exists.
The equation for \(E\) yields an equation for \(H\),
We can rearrange this equation and divide by \(h\), and we get for any \(s, h \in \mathbb {R}\), \(h \ne 0\),
If \(s = s_0\), then the LHS tends to \(H'(s_0)\) as \(h \to 0\). The RHS must therefore also have a limit as \(s \to 0\), and observing that \(\frac{H(h)}{h} = \frac{H(h) - H(0)}{h}\), that limit is \(H'(0) A(e^{s_0})\), which shows that the derivative \(H'(0)\) exists. Then applying the same equation at general \(s \in \mathbb {R}\) shows that \(H'(s) = H'(0) A(e^{s})\) must exist, so \(H \colon \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) is in fact everywhere differentiable.
Note that we must have \(H'(0) {\gt} 0\), because if \(H'(0) = 0\) then by the above equation \(H'(s) = 0\) for every \(s\) and then \(H\) is a constant function, which is a contradiction. Denote \(c = H'(0) = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}s} E(e^s) \big|_{s=0} = E'(1)\).
Also the equation and positivity of the function \(A\) give \(H'(s){\gt}0\) for all \(s\).
Now consider \(Q(s) = \frac{H(s)}{c}\). This \(H\) is obviously also differentiable, since \(H\) is. The equation for \(H\) yields the following equation for \(Q\),
where \(\alpha (s) = A(e^{s})\). By Lemma 3.1 \(Q\) is then twice continuously differentiable and satisfies
By Lemma 3.2 we then get a formula for \(Q\), which involves
If \(\gamma \ne 0\) then the formula reads \(Q(s) = \frac{e^{\gamma s} - 1}{\gamma }\). Now just tracing the definitions, we get the asserted formula
If \(\gamma = 0\) then the formula reads \(Q(s) = s\). Now just tracing the definitions, we get instead
and the proof is complete.